Every task and project requires time, money, and material to complete. An activity’s results should always merit the expenditure of these resources, whether or not they’re in short supply. In other words, the impact of a project or task needs to justify its level of effort (LOE).

When faced with competing priorities, project managers can leverage the impact effort matrix to prioritize jobs and communicate the order of completion to team members and stakeholders.

What is an impact effort matrix?

The impact vs. effort matrix is similar to another decision-making tool, the Eisenhower prioritization matrix. Both use a two-by-two grid with an x-axis and a y-axis to categorize work. However, the Eisenhower matrix ranks tasks according to urgency and importance, whereas this variant uses exertion and consequence.

The project team measures impact according to a task or project’s ability to achieve a strategic goal and gauges effort in terms of resources (e.g., money, time, or physical assets) needed to accomplish the work. Action items are then ranked within the impact effort matrix template by comparing those two variables, allowing the project management team to quickly visualize and prioritize tasks.

The completed assessment provides a clear roadmap for the team to draft an action plan that delivers the highest return on investment (ROI).

Impact effort matrix axes

The impact effort matrix is easy to use. The x-axis defines the required effort, and the y-axis represents the impact produced. Together, these axes form a two-by-two table.

Here’s how these factors are evaluated:

  • Impact: How valuable is the task or project to the company? Does it move the needle on long-term goals? The greater its effect, the more promise the work holds.
  • Effort: What resources does the task or project require? Can the work be completed with existing assets? 

These measures don’t have to be quantified; a qualitative analysis is all you need. However, team members must prioritize actions through collaboration and communication.  

Impact effort matrix quadrants

Now that the team understands the axes’ defined values, it can visualize and categorize the quadrants based on their relationship.

Quadrant 1: Low effort / High impactLow-hanging fruitQuadrant 2: High Effort / High impactMajor projects
Quadrant 3: Low effort / Low impactNice to havesQuadrant 4: High effort / Low impactTime sinks
  1. Low-hanging fruit: These quick wins deliver considerable value for minimal effort. Because of their ease and speed of implementation, they belong at the top of the team’s to-do list.
  2. Major projects: These activities hold significant promise but require considerable time and resources. Working on them can be risky, so assess their potential value to ensure they yield substantial ROI. 
  3. Nice to haves: These items are usually side projects or experiments that are easy to implement but don’t provide much value for the company. The team can work on these when they have extra time or resources that aren’t required elsewhere.
  4. Time sinks: These are thankless tasks to avoid at all costs. If regulations or policy force their completion, assign nonessential resources and personnel to the job, at least temporarily. These tasks can provide a valuable learning experience for newbies while freeing the time of more experienced staff. 

5 benefits of the impact effort matrix

LOE project management delivers several critical benefits:

1. Builds alignment

Conducting and communicating an impact effort matrix ensures everyone is on the same page while working toward a common goal. Team members can ensure their efforts build off one another and contribute to the outcome. 

2. Optimizes resource allocation

The priority matrix outlines which tasks to complete first, providing context to the resource and capacity management team. The data helps them allocate assets accordingly, ensuring high-priority tasks receive critical resources without delay.

3. Roadmaps task completion

By sequencing task completion, the impact effort matrix becomes a high-level project roadmap, explaining which tasks project managers should prioritize and why. Team members can focus on work according to established priorities rather than mistakenly operating at cross purposes. 

4. Connects work to company objectives

Employees must also consider the organization’s long- and short-term goals to build an effective impact effort chart. This insight helps them see how their work contributes to these strategies, increasing motivation and engagement. 

5. Improves productivity and workflow

By understanding the group’s priorities, team members can avoid wasting time on tasks that deliver little value to the organization. Their workflows become more efficient, ensuring timely contributions to the team’s overall performance. 

Tips for using the impact effort matrix

The following best practices will help the team prioritize tasks effectively as they draft an impact effort priority matrix.

Establish clear objectives

Project managers must establish why the team needs to create an impact effort matrix. This shared goal aligns the team and ensures their effectiveness. 

Involve the entire team

Gather team members and other stakeholders for a task and project priority brainstorming session. Varied perspectives can improve accuracy and uncover additional insights.  

Follow up

It’s pointless to prioritize tasks without the means to complete them. Establish an action plan, including the completion sequence, to ensure team members have a smooth workflow and complete tasks on schedule.

Communicate

Proactively communicate the sequence of events to stakeholders to ensure everyone aligns on priorities and workflows. Also, solicit feedback on the matrix’s efficacy to provide incremental improvement for the next iteration. 

The best tool for defining objectives

No matter your preferred project management approach – whether it’s Kanban, Six Sigma Lean, or the traditional waterfall – your practice must involve prioritization tools. So, trade in your sticky notes and whiteboards for a digital solution like Tempo’s Strategic Roadmaps to better communicate priorities to your team.  

An audience-ready roadmap facilitates alignment while improving strategic organization and team collaboration. In addition, project managers can use the chart to rank, track, and manage task completion once team members identify their priorities using an Eisenhower matrix, impact effort matrix, or other prioritization methodology. 

All Tempo products are modular and Jira-enabled, allowing organizations to scale the tech stack according to their unique needs.